Is the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?

Puff Bar

Is the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?

Puff Bar is a fantastic alternative to a traditional ice cream treat since it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is really a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it’s a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. In addition to that, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it as often as you want without having to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because you can serve.

Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, which was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. Whenever we smoke we are exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes since it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.

One of the biggest issues in public health today is obesity and diet. Because of this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these brilliant products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that people who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so if they only need to take with you the small product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.

By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Based on the FDA any e-cigarette that contains nicotine must contain an insert that allows you to put it into your mouth, because of this you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you might go. If the product also has an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of the law. The reason being that since there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to use to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke another one.

Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the companies that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a way that is illegal. Besides sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request that they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested they call it a “tobacco alternative”.

What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there podsmall.com is currently no law mandating that electric cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco in to the marketplace.

Plus the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes on the market could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to younger generations, this could substantially reduce the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not supply them with nicotine.

It seems that the UK government may have a point. There is currently no requirement of tobacco companies to include warning labels on the products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The only thing that these products all have in common is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It looks a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem like a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which in turn means that fewer people will purchase them.